Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options¶
Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G. F., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 576-590.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Joint vs. Separate Evaluation
- Less-is-better effects, sequence effects in hiring, preference reversals in willingness-to-pay studies, debate-effect amplifications in deliberation, and the dinnerware-and-chocolate families of consumer studies are all instances of one structure: attribute evaluability is mode-dependent.
This sourceReview establishing the evaluability hypothesis as the single generating mechanism behind less-is-better, sequence, and willingness-to-pay reversal effects.
- Less-is-better effects, sequence effects in hiring, preference reversals in willingness-to-pay studies, debate-effect amplifications in deliberation, and the dinnerware-and-chocolate families of consumer studies are all instances of one structure: attribute evaluability is mode-dependent.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b5efafdb6454 · see in the full table