Skip to content

Continued use of retracted papers

Hsiao, T., & Schneider, J. (2021). Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1144-1169.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
2021
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
1144-1169
DOI
10.1162/qss_a_00155
DOI registrant
MIT Press
Link
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00155
Cited from
philosophy

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:b608adf28eae · see in the full table