Typology and Universals

Croft, W. (2003). Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2003

DOI

10.1017/cbo9780511840579

ISBN

9780521004992

DOI registrant

Cambridge University Press

Link

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840579

Cited from

linguistics_semiotics

Cited by

4 citations across 4 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Contextual Mode Switching
  • The prime subsumes domain-specific variants (code-switching between languages, register-shifting between formalities, cognitive-mode switching between intuitive and deliberative reasoning) as instances of the same pattern.

    This sourceSurveys cross-linguistic typology and language universals. NON-SUPPORTING for the cited claim about 'multi-mode-fluency competence that allows re-evaluation as context evolves' — the book concerns typological patterns, not an agent's competence to monitor/re-evaluate communicative modes. Existence/details verified; flagged.

• Markedness
  • Companion concepts: Croft 2003 Typology and Universals

    This sourceCroft Typology Universals integrative framework synchronic patterns diachronic processes.

• Synchronic vs. Diachronic Analysis
  • Modern integrationist positions (Bybee's usage-based framework; Croft's 2003 Typology and Universals

    This sourceCroft Typology Universals integrative framework synchronic patterns diachronic processes.

Domain-specific

• Grammatical category
  • Croft's typological-method discussion underscores why cross-linguistic categories must be justified through constructional and distributional evidence rather than imported wholesale from a familiar language.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:b630f4869e7a · see in the full table