The Bermuda Triangle

Maxson Jones, K., Ankeny, R. A., & Cook-Deegan, R. (2018). The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project. Journal of the History of Biology, 51(4), 693-805.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2018

Volume

51

Issue

4

Pages

693-805

DOI

10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7

DOI registrant

Springer Nature

Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7

Cited from

economics_finance

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• First Mover Advantage
  • From scientific priority to policy negotiation, norms built around priority (deposit-before-publish for genomic data, preregistration of trials) suggest early-disclosure mechanisms that prevent unilateral preemption of shared resources.

    This sourceDocuments the Bermuda Principles' mandate of rapid pre-publication release of genomic sequence — a priority-protecting disclosure norm that prevents unilateral preemption of a shared resource.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    Supplies the Bermuda Principles as an archetype of rapid genomic data sharing, but not the priority/anti-preemption mechanism, and nothing on trial preregistration.

    “the Bermuda Principles addressed concerns about gene patents impeding scientific advancement, and were aspirational and flexible in implementation and justification. They endured as an archetype for how rapid data sharing could be realized and rationalized”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:b653c8365404 · see in the full table