Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.¶
(2017). Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Doctrine of Repair and Reconstruction
- Impression Products v. Lexmark confirms that an authorized sale exhausts patent rights in the item regardless of purported post-sale patent restrictions and whether the sale occurs domestically or abroad
This sourceSupplies Impression Products' holding that an authorized sale exhausts patent rights regardless of post-sale restrictions or whether the sale was domestic or foreign.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Impression Products v. Lexmark confirms that an authorized sale exhausts patent rights in the item regardless of purported post-sale patent restrictions and whether the sale occurs domestically or abroad
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b7357559f79e · see in the full table