Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., 581 U.S. 360 (2017)¶
(2017). Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., 581 U.S. 360 (2017).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Doctrine of Repair and Reconstruction
- … offering to sell, or importing the invention, and § 271(a) defines unauthorized making and use as infringement. Impression Products v. Lexmark confirms that an authorized sale exhausts patent rights in the item regardless of purported post-sale patent restrictions and whether the sale occurs domestically or abroad
This sourceSupplies Impression Products' holding that an authorized sale exhausts patent rights regardless of post-sale restrictions or whether the sale was domestic or foreign.
- … offering to sell, or importing the invention, and § 271(a) defines unauthorized making and use as infringement. Impression Products v. Lexmark confirms that an authorized sale exhausts patent rights in the item regardless of purported post-sale patent restrictions and whether the sale occurs domestically or abroad
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b7357559f79e · see in the full table