Skip to content

The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem

Kuhn, H. W. (1955). The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1–2), 1-2.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
1955
Volume
2
Issue
1–2
Pages
1-2
DOI
10.1002/nav.3800020109
DOI registrant
Wiley
Link
https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800020109
Cited from
economics_finance, operations_research

Cited by

6 citations across 6 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Network Flow Models
    • the assignment problem was studied by Kuhn (1955), producing the Hungarian algorithm;

      This sourceOriginal polynomial-time algorithm for the maximum-weight bipartite assignment problem; the weighted-assignment cousin of stable matching underlying ad allocation, task scheduling, and real-time dispatch.

      SupportedVerified against the publisher's abstract

      Kuhn states the problem in his own terms, as “the quest for an assignment of persons to jobs so that the sum of the n scores so obtained is as large as possible”, and presents the paper's result as “a new method of solving this problem”. The work therefore supplies both the assignment problem the sentence names and the method the sentence credits to it. The name Hungarian rests on the work's title; the underlying ideas are attributed only to “two Hungarian mathematicians”, and the work does not frame the method in terms of network flow.

      “Assuming that numerical scores are available for the performance of each of n persons on each of n jobs, the “assignment problem” is the quest for an assignment of persons to jobs so that the sum of the n scores so obtained is as large as possible. It is shown that ideas latent in the work of two Hungarian mathematicians may be exploited to yield a new method of solving this problem.”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

  • Two-Sided Matching

Domain-specific

Mechanisms

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 6 citations: 1 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:b7f53ef0fb88 · see in the full table