ISO 21127:2014 Information and documentation — A reference ontology for the interchange of cultural heritage information

International Organization for Standardization. (2014). ISO 21127:2014 Information and documentation — A reference ontology for the interchange of cultural heritage information: Information and Documentation — A Reference Ontology for the Interchange of Cultural Heritage Information (CIDOC CRM).

Type

Standard

Intellectual base

Reference work

Year

2014

Link

https://www.iso.org/standard/57832.html

Cited from

history_historiography

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Appellation
  • In cultural-heritage documentation, objects acquire accession numbers and catalogue titles that pick out one work across every conversation worldwide.

    This sourceThe standard ontology for cultural-heritage documentation, providing the framework within which museum objects are assigned authoritative accession identifiers and catalogue titles that pick out a work across institutions.

Domain-specific

• Acquisition event
  • The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model designates the title-transfer case as E8 Acquisition — an event-type entity with a defined before-state (the acquiring actor did not own the resource), a defined after-state (the actor now owns it), a transfer instrument naming the mode of transition (purchase, donation, bequest, conquest, capture, legal grant), a timestamp or date range anchoring the transition in time, and a provenance link connecting this event to the prior owner — and keeps custody-only moves such as a loan or hire in a separate class, E10 Transfer of Custody

    This sourceThe ISO standard form of the CIDOC CRM, whose class E8 Acquisition records the transfer of legal ownership between actors, with custody-only transfers modelled separately as E10 Transfer of Custody.

    Supported in partVerified against the source

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:b817806b4106 · see in the full table