The relation between group cohesiveness and performance¶
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210-227.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Group Cohesion
- Social psychology: A team's felt solidarity and members' desire to stay; high cohesion raises morale and conformity pressure, and the cohesion–performance relationship is moderated by whether the group's norms favor productivity, as Mullen and Copper's (1994) meta-analysis established.
This sourceMeta-analysis finding the cohesion–performance effect is small, stronger in real than artificial groups, and driven primarily by commitment to task (not interpersonal attraction or group pride); cross-lagged analysis suggests the stronger direction runs performance→cohesion.
- Social psychology: A team's felt solidarity and members' desire to stay; high cohesion raises morale and conformity pressure, and the cohesion–performance relationship is moderated by whether the group's norms favor productivity, as Mullen and Copper's (1994) meta-analysis established.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b87ff9cd4232 · see in the full table