Joint Strike Fighter: Restructuring Places Program on Firmer Footing, but Progress Still Lags¶
United States Government Accountability Office. (2011). Joint Strike Fighter: Restructuring Places Program on Firmer Footing, but Progress Still Lags: Restructuring Places Program on Firmer Footing, but Progress Still Lags.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Milestone Theater
- The most heavily documented instance is major U.S. defense acquisition, where the Government Accountability Office has repeatedly criticized "concurrency"
This sourceGAO's recurring Joint Strike Fighter finding that the programme's aggressive acquisition strategy involved substantial concurrency, overlap among development, testing and production, a prime contributor to its poor cost, schedule and performance outcomes. GAO's finding that the F-35 programme ran substantial concurrency - production overlapping incomplete development and testing - with defects discovered late and the design still not fully demonstrated after nine years of development.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“One recurring theme has been the "single step," or revolutionary, acquisition strategy the JSF program adopted to develop and acquire full combat capabilities on a very aggressive, risky schedule with substantial concurrency, or overlap among development, testing, and production activities.”
- The most heavily documented instance is major U.S. defense acquisition, where the Government Accountability Office has repeatedly criticized "concurrency"
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b8ae93f287f0 · see in the full table