Federal Circuit opinion, No. 04-1618¶
Fuji Photo Film Co. v. International Trade Commission, 4. F. 3. 1. (2007). Federal Circuit opinion, No. 04-1618.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Doctrine of Repair and Reconstruction
- … reviewed the same refurbishment practices and reversed the Commission on one of the steps: replacing a camera's back cover in its entirety was part of a permissible repair rather than reconstruction, because the back had to be broken to remove the exposed film and was itself a spent part once new film was inserted
This sourceSupplies Fuji Photo's holding that the Commission erred in treating cameras whose full backs were replaced as impermissibly reconstructed, and that replacing the full back was instead part of a permissible repair, because the back covers had to be broken to remove the film and were spent parts that could no longer serve their function once new film was inserted; it is cited alongside Jazz Photo on the lens-fitted film package example.
- … reviewed the same refurbishment practices and reversed the Commission on one of the steps: replacing a camera's back cover in its entirety was part of a permissible repair rather than reconstruction, because the back had to be broken to remove the exposed film and was itself a spent part once new film was inserted
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b8b734320907 · see in the full table