People v. Ryan¶
Supreme Court of Colorado. (1991). People v. Ryan.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Substantial truth
- Not publisher fault. Actual malice in the US public-figure setting concerns knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard under the applicable constitutional standard. Masson needed to address the relationship between alteration and falsity in that setting, but the material-sting comparison is distinct from a general statement that all defamation requires actual malice.
This sourceFull court opinion inspected for the criminal-libel fault boundary, not as a worked substantial-truth case.
- Not publisher fault. Actual malice in the US public-figure setting concerns knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard under the applicable constitutional standard. Masson needed to address the relationship between alteration and falsity in that setting, but the material-sting comparison is distinct from a general statement that all defamation requires actual malice.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b97177dec6d8 · see in the full table