L'Analyse Structurale en Linguistique et en Anthropologie¶
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1945). L'Analyse Structurale en Linguistique et en Anthropologie. <i>WORD</i>.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Phonology
- Beyond that substrate the case is (B) with the analogies firmly (A) — and phonology is the textbook illustration of why the distinction matters. Phonology is the most fully worked-out example of structuralism in linguistics, and its early-20-century success (Trubetzkoy, Jakobson) is what seeded structuralist programmes across the human sciences: Lévi-Strauss explicitly modeled structural anthropology on Prague-School phonology, taking over Trubetzkoy's four operations — the move from conscious phenomena to their unconscious infrastructure, terms treated as relations rather than independent entities, the notion of system, and the search for general laws — as anthropology's own programme
This sourceThe Levi-Strauss clause, and precisely as the sentence now puts it: the essay names Troubetzkoy 'the illustrious founder of structural linguistics' and adopts his four operations - unconscious infrastructure, terms as relations, the notion of system, the search for general laws - as anthropology's own programme; the wider claims about structuralism's reach, and the entry's own classification of the case, are not the essay's.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Beyond that substrate the case is (B) with the analogies firmly (A) — and phonology is the textbook illustration of why the distinction matters. Phonology is the most fully worked-out example of structuralism in linguistics, and its early-20-century success (Trubetzkoy, Jakobson) is what seeded structuralist programmes across the human sciences: Lévi-Strauss explicitly modeled structural anthropology on Prague-School phonology, taking over Trubetzkoy's four operations — the move from conscious phenomena to their unconscious infrastructure, terms treated as relations rather than independent entities, the notion of system, and the search for general laws — as anthropology's own programme
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b9bda52a1ac7 · see in the full table