CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command¶
MITRE Corporation. CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Parameterized Interpreter Call
- Its strength is that it makes the data/control boundary a property the interpreter enforces, rather than a string-hygiene habit the developer must get right on every call — the standard first-line control against injection into a query language.
This sourceCommon Weakness Enumeration (nd). Recommends structured mechanisms such as prepared statements and parameterized queries that enforce separation between data and SQL code as a primary defense against injection.
- Its strength is that it makes the data/control boundary a property the interpreter enforces, rather than a string-hygiene habit the developer must get right on every call — the standard first-line control against injection into a query language.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b9f57782e5ff · see in the full table