An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance¶
Schmader, T., Johns, & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336-356.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Stereotype Threat
- The individual becomes concerned with confirming the stereotype as a judgment about themselves or their group, and this motivated concern activates a suite of cognitive and physiological costs: heightened vigilance, intrusive self-relevant thoughts, physiological arousal, and crucially, occupation of working-memory capacity.
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
Schmader et al.'s process model has threat trigger stress arousal, vigilance and thought suppression that together consume working-memory resources.
“cues that activate negative self-relevant stereotypes set in motion a series of processes including a physiological stress response, monitoring of the performance situation for self-relevant information, and efforts to suppress negative thoughts and feelings that result from the previous two processes.”
- The individual becomes concerned with confirming the stereotype as a judgment about themselves or their group, and this motivated concern activates a suite of cognitive and physiological costs: heightened vigilance, intrusive self-relevant thoughts, physiological arousal, and crucially, occupation of working-memory capacity.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ba8b0b83c450 · see in the full table