NASA Systems Engineering Handbook¶
Hirshorn, S. R., Voss, & Bromley, L. K. (2017). NASA Systems Engineering Handbook.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Site Readiness Assessment
- … it closes the gap between what worked under ideal pilot conditions and what will hold under everyday ones — an operational readiness review, the discipline aerospace and other high-consequence fields use to verify a specific unit is prepared before it goes live, not merely that the design once worked somewhere.
This sourceDefines NASA operational readiness review as verifying that the deployed system and its supporting hardware, software, personnel, procedures, capabilities, and documentation are ready for normal operations.
- … it closes the gap between what worked under ideal pilot conditions and what will hold under everyday ones — an operational readiness review, the discipline aerospace and other high-consequence fields use to verify a specific unit is prepared before it goes live, not merely that the design once worked somewhere.
- Strategy Switch Decision Tree
- The discipline is to gate each branch on real evidence of the cause (often from a capacity-context read), keep the option menu current, and treat the tree's output as a candidate to validate, not a verdict
This sourceTreats decision-analysis output as a recommendation with uncertainty information for a decision-maker, not as the final verdict.
- The discipline is to gate each branch on real evidence of the cause (often from a capacity-context read), keep the option menu current, and treat the tree's output as a candidate to validate, not a verdict
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:bb078d6191ef · see in the full table