Double Counting and the Paris Agreement Rulebook.¶
Schneider, L., Duan, M., Stavins, R., Kizzier, K., Broekhoff, D., Jotzo, F., Winkler, H., et al. (2019). Double Counting and the Paris Agreement Rulebook. Science, 366(6462), 180-183.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Double Counting
- In carbon accounting the same tonne of avoided emissions is claimed by the project developer, the offset buyer, and the host country's inventory, and the corresponding-adjustment mechanism is an inclusion–exclusion fix imposed on a previously double-counting system.
This sourceAnalyzes how the same emission reduction is claimed by multiple parties and resolved through corresponding adjustments.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract supports the general concern that poor emissions accounting can undermine carbon markets, but not the specific triple-claim or inclusion-exclusion mechanism.
“Poor emissions accounting could undermine carbon markets”
- In carbon accounting the same tonne of avoided emissions is claimed by the project developer, the offset buyer, and the host country's inventory, and the corresponding-adjustment mechanism is an inclusion–exclusion fix imposed on a previously double-counting system.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bb65db93d955 · see in the full table