Introduction aux études historiques¶
Langlois, C., & Seignobos, C. (1898). Introduction aux études historiques. Introduction to the Study of History.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Primary vs. Secondary Sources
- It is not the Hermeneutic Circle (#265) — the hermeneutic circle is about the interpretive back-and-forth; the primary/secondary distinction is about the layering of materials that the circle operates on, an infrastructural-versus-interpretive split that Langlois and Seignobos (1898) instituted as the foundational division between external (source) criticism and internal (interpretive) criticism.
This sourceFoundational positivist methodology: separates external criticism (authentication, provenance, source classification) from internal criticism (interpretation), establishing the infrastructural-versus-interpretive split.
- It is not the Hermeneutic Circle (#265) — the hermeneutic circle is about the interpretive back-and-forth; the primary/secondary distinction is about the layering of materials that the circle operates on, an infrastructural-versus-interpretive split that Langlois and Seignobos (1898) instituted as the foundational division between external (source) criticism and internal (interpretive) criticism.
Mechanisms¶
- Source Criticism Protocol
- It is the historian's classic discipline — Quellenkritik, the external-and-internal source criticism systematized in nineteenth-century historiography
This sourceSystematizes historical method into external and internal criticism for evaluating documents and constructing historical knowledge.
- It is the historian's classic discipline — Quellenkritik, the external-and-internal source criticism systematized in nineteenth-century historiography
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bbbc47a00a41 · see in the full table