Embargoed Science

Kiernan, V. (2006). Embargoed Science. University of Illinois Press.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2006

Link

https://archive.org/details/embargoedscience0000kier

Cited from

communication_media_studies

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Information Use License
  • The terminating event is a clock, and at that instant the permitted set widens for every recipient at once without anyone issuing anything.

    This sourceDocuments the embargo as an institution: advance distribution to accredited reporters under terms barring publication before a stated hour, at which the restriction lifts for every recipient at once, with loss of access rather than legal remedy as the operative sanction.

Domain-specific

• Embargo
  • The enforcement mechanism is not primarily legal but exclusionary: a journalist or outlet that breaks an embargo is cut from future embargoed distributions

    This sourceKiernan's account that journalists who break an embargo may be cut off from future embargoed access, an understood professional sanction rather than a legal one. Kiernan's account that major scholarly journals distribute embargoed advance information to approved reporters who agree to operate by the embargo rules. The EurekAlert! service through which journal publishers give approved journalists embargoed access to forthcoming articles. Kiernan's account of the suspension sanction — an outlet that breaks an embargo loses its future embargoed access, as when a journal suspended Reuters's access.

    Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source

    “apparently is understood that journalists who {{{violate the embargo}}} may be cut off from future embargoed access”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:bbd01914fab8 · see in the full table