Validity of self-evaluation of ability¶
Mabe, P. A., & West, S. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 280-296.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Dunning-Kruger Effect
- Educational interventions that target both competence and metacognitive calibration (structured feedback on diagnostic error rates, explicit calibration training) have demonstrated simultaneous improvements in diagnostic accuracy and confidence-estimate accuracy.
This sourceMeta-analysis (55 studies; mean r ≈ .29) identifying conditions under which self-evaluation is more accurate; supports D16-112 (self-assessment accuracy is conditionally improvable, e.g., by feedback/comparison-expectation).
- Educational interventions that target both competence and metacognitive calibration (structured feedback on diagnostic error rates, explicit calibration training) have demonstrated simultaneous improvements in diagnostic accuracy and confidence-estimate accuracy.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bbedc52409bf · see in the full table