Bayesian Reasoning and the Prior in Court¶
Meester, R., & Stevens, L. (2024). Bayesian Reasoning and the Prior in Court: Not Legally Normative but Unavoidable. Law, Probability and Risk.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cromwell's Rule
- Legal reasoning — the presumption of innocence is a deliberate nonzero prior on innocence, and appeals and habeas corpus exist because no finding should be infinitely irrevisable.
This sourceArgues a prior is necessary and cannot be dispensed with in legal fact-finding, and addresses the tension between a nonzero prior of guilt and the presumption of innocence — grounding the presumption-as-nonzero-prior and revisability framing.
- Legal reasoning — the presumption of innocence is a deliberate nonzero prior on innocence, and appeals and habeas corpus exist because no finding should be infinitely irrevisable.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bc0d486675cc · see in the full table