Vagueness.¶
Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Boundary
- Philosophy of language and vagueness: Williamson's epistemic theory of vagueness
This sourceepistemicism — vague predicates have precise but unknowable boundaries; vagueness is a feature of our knowledge/language, with sharp cutoffs that exist but cannot be known (margin-for-error principle).
- Philosophy of language and vagueness: Williamson's epistemic theory of vagueness
Mechanisms¶
- Category Boundary Audit
- Every category has some vague border — the classic sorites problem is that a boundary can be fuzzy without being wrong
This sourceAnalyzes the sorites paradox as a central problem of vague predicates.
- Every category has some vague border — the classic sorites problem is that a boundary can be fuzzy without being wrong
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:bc39a9101c60 · see in the full table