Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?¶
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Entanglement
- Measurement outcomes on entangled partners are correlated in ways that violate Bell-type inequalities, a phenomenon absent from local realistic theories.
This sourceThe seminal EPR argument that quantum mechanics yields correlations between separated systems not explicable by a complete local description — the historical origin of the entanglement construct.
- Measurement outcomes on entangled partners are correlated in ways that violate Bell-type inequalities, a phenomenon absent from local realistic theories.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bd79a67cef8d · see in the full table