Presuppositions of compound sentences¶
Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), 169-193.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Dependency
- Dependencies can be material (downstream production needs upstream parts, the configuration Lee, Padmanabhan, and Whang (1997) showed amplifies demand variation through the bullwhip effect), informational (a downstream calculation needs an upstream input), temporal (a later event needs an earlier one to have occurred), logical (a theorem needs a lemma), semantic (a referring expression needs a referent, the relation Karttunen (1973) formalized in his account of presupposition projection), or institutional (a contractual obligation needs a triggering condition).
This sourceFoundational presupposition-projection paper: a compound sentence's presuppositions are computed from its parts by a context-update procedure, establishing the atemporal, non-causal character of semantic dependency.
- Dependencies can be material (downstream production needs upstream parts, the configuration Lee, Padmanabhan, and Whang (1997) showed amplifies demand variation through the bullwhip effect), informational (a downstream calculation needs an upstream input), temporal (a later event needs an earlier one to have occurred), logical (a theorem needs a lemma), semantic (a referring expression needs a referent, the relation Karttunen (1973) formalized in his account of presupposition projection), or institutional (a contractual obligation needs a triggering condition).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bd852d20e38a · see in the full table