Presuppositions of compound sentences¶
Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), 169-193.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Dependency
- Dependencies can be material (downstream production needs upstream parts, the configuration Lee, Padmanabhan, and Whang (1997) showed amplifies demand variation through the bullwhip effect), informational (a downstream calculation needs an upstream input), temporal (a later event needs an earlier one to have occurred), logical (a theorem needs a lemma), semantic (a referring expression needs a referent, the relation Karttunen (1973) formalized in his account of presupposition projection), or institutional (a contractual obligation needs a triggering condition).
This sourceFoundational presupposition-projection paper: a compound sentence's presuppositions are computed from its parts by a context-update procedure, establishing the atemporal, non-causal character of semantic dependency — supports markers 213 and 223.
- Dependencies can be material (downstream production needs upstream parts, the configuration Lee, Padmanabhan, and Whang (1997) showed amplifies demand variation through the bullwhip effect), informational (a downstream calculation needs an upstream input), temporal (a later event needs an earlier one to have occurred), logical (a theorem needs a lemma), semantic (a referring expression needs a referent, the relation Karttunen (1973) formalized in his account of presupposition projection), or institutional (a contractual obligation needs a triggering condition).
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bd852d20e38a · see in the full table