Self-Efficacy¶
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Collective Efficacy
This sourceW. H. Freeman. Comprehensive treatment of individual self-efficacy; the foundation from which group-level collective efficacy is scaled.
- Self-Efficacy
- The structure ensures that efficacy beliefs are domain-specific, updatable by experience, and causally connected to action selection and persistence.
This sourceW.H. Freeman. Comprehensive treatment of individual self-efficacy; foundation for group-level extensions. self-efficacy foundational theory for scaling.
- The structure ensures that efficacy beliefs are domain-specific, updatable by experience, and causally connected to action selection and persistence.
Mechanisms¶
- Constructive Action Bridge
- It leans on collective efficacy — a group that acts together on a shared concern builds a durable sense that it can, which both discharges the affect and strengthens the group.
This sourceDevelops collective efficacy as a group-level belief in conjoint capability.
- It leans on collective efficacy — a group that acts together on a shared concern builds a durable sense that it can, which both discharges the affect and strengthens the group.
- Nonclinical Coaching Evidence Check
- The concept underneath is self-efficacy — a belief about one's capability that is separable from, and testable against, actual performance.
This sourceDefines self-efficacy as belief in one’s capability to organize and execute action, a judgment that is conceptually distinct from the behavior or performance it helps predict.
- The concept underneath is self-efficacy — a belief about one's capability that is separable from, and testable against, actual performance.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:bdaa372c9269 · see in the full table