Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice¶
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice. The Essential Tension.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Frame Change
- It carries no claim that the successor is truer or more useful, and no claim that a frame's replaceability makes all frames equally good: the bridge and the invariant list are exactly what allow one frame to be judged against another, and they are internal to the operation rather than dissolved by it.
This sourceArgues that a successor is judged against shared criteria - accuracy, consistency, scope, simplicity, fruitfulness - so replaceability does not make competing schemes equally good.
- It carries no claim that the successor is truer or more useful, and no claim that a frame's replaceability makes all frames equally good: the bridge and the invariant list are exactly what allow one frame to be judged against another, and they are internal to the operation rather than dissolved by it.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:be1278275118 · see in the full table