Gestalt Psychology¶
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Gestalt Principles
- Wertheimer's 1923 demonstrations used arrays of dots arranged to show individual principles cleanly and measurably, demonstrations Köhler (1929) further developed in Gestalt Psychology with extensive analyses of how perceptual organization arises automatically from element-level relations rather than from learned association.
This sourceDefinitive English-language statement of Berlin-School gestalt theory, with analyses of how perceptual organization arises automatically from element-level relations rather than learned association.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Köhler credits Wertheimer's 1923 dot and line demonstrations and argues grouping arises spontaneously rather than from previous experience; 'measurably' and the dot-array detail are not in the text.
“Most of his illustrations entail the grouping of separate dots or lines, because, by using meaningless constellations in this manner, it is easier to guard the demonstration against disturbing arguments and criticism in terms of previous knowledge.”
- Wertheimer's 1923 demonstrations used arrays of dots arranged to show individual principles cleanly and measurably, demonstrations Köhler (1929) further developed in Gestalt Psychology with extensive analyses of how perceptual organization arises automatically from element-level relations rather than from learned association.
- Iconicity
This sourceLiveright. Definitive English-language statement of Berlin-School gestalt theory, with extensive analyses of how perceptual organization arises automatically from element-level relations rather than from learned association.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:be1704ed2ba0 · see in the full table