The Applied Critical Thinking Handbook, Version 8.1¶
Department of the Army. (2016). The Applied Critical Thinking Handbook, Version 8.1. University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Red-Team Exercise
- Its strength is that it counters the optimism defenders hold about their own work — a red team finds the seam that the people who built the system are constitutionally unable to see, and it ranks what it finds so the fix follows the real risk.
This sourceUses red teaming to challenge assumptions, confirmation bias, groupthink, and overly narrow perspectives in planning.
- Its strength is that it counters the optimism defenders hold about their own work — a red team finds the seam that the people who built the system are constitutionally unable to see, and it ranks what it finds so the fix follows the real risk.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:be9040edf3ad · see in the full table