Computational principles of movement neuroscience¶
Wolpert, & Ghahramani. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Predictive Remapping
- Visuospatial neuroscience — the origin and home: pre-saccadic receptive-field remapping, first documented in lateral intraparietal area (LIP) by Duhamel, Colby, and Goldberg (1992) and since found in the frontal eye fields (FEF) and superior colliculus, underwriting trans-saccadic perceptual continuity. Human cognitive neuroimaging — the same anticipatory-shift signature replicated and extended in human parietal and frontal areas, and tied to the pre-saccadic pre-allocation of spatial attention. Action-perception neuroscience — the broader efference-copy and forward-model accounts of motor anticipation (Wolpert and Ghahramani)
This sourceReview setting out the forward-model account in which an efference copy predicts the consequences of one's own movements, used to offset feedback delays and cancel reafference.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Visuospatial neuroscience — the origin and home: pre-saccadic receptive-field remapping, first documented in lateral intraparietal area (LIP) by Duhamel, Colby, and Goldberg (1992) and since found in the frontal eye fields (FEF) and superior colliculus, underwriting trans-saccadic perceptual continuity. Human cognitive neuroimaging — the same anticipatory-shift signature replicated and extended in human parietal and frontal areas, and tied to the pre-saccadic pre-allocation of spatial attention. Action-perception neuroscience — the broader efference-copy and forward-model accounts of motor anticipation (Wolpert and Ghahramani)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bea6d52a2fb0 · see in the full table