Rule 901, "Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

Evidence, F. R. o. Rule 901, "Authenticating or Identifying Evidence.

Type

Web resource

Intellectual base

Web

Link

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_901

Cited from

computer_science

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Authentication
  • Law and finance — signature verification, notarisation, identity documents, due-diligence checks, and chain-of-custody for evidence.

    This sourceRequires the proponent to "produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is" — the legal instantiation of binding a claimed identity/origin to admissible evidence.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    Rule 901 covers authenticating evidence, including handwriting comparison and custody accounting, but not notarisation, due diligence, or finance.

    “testimony establishing narcotics as taken from an accused and accounting for custody through the period until trial, including laboratory analysis”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:bf277147ef8a · see in the full table