Hybrid Forms of Third-Party Dispute Resolution¶
Ross, W. H., & Conlon, D. E. (2000). Hybrid Forms of Third-Party Dispute Resolution: Theoretical Implications of Combining Mediation and Arbitration. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 416-427.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Mediation, Deadlock, and Escalation Ladder
- Its strength is that it guarantees closure while preserving the chance to settle cooperatively first: the early rungs let parties reach their own agreement, and the binding rungs ensure that a holdout's patience cannot become a permanent veto.
This sourceExplains how mediation-arbitration preserves a mediation opportunity for party settlement while a binding arbitral phase resolves any remaining impasse.
- Its strength is that it guarantees closure while preserving the chance to settle cooperatively first: the early rungs let parties reach their own agreement, and the binding rungs ensure that a holdout's patience cannot become a permanent veto.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:bff22e11be51 · see in the full table