ISIS-4: A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58 050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction¶
ISIS-4 Collaborative Group. (1995). ISIS-4: A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58 050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The Lancet.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Funnel Plot Asymmetry
- Then the very large ISIS-4 trial (1995, ~58,000 patients) found no mortality benefit, landing near the null exactly where the missing small studies should have scattered.
This sourceReports the trial itself: 58,050 patients randomised in 1995, with intravenous magnesium sulphate showing no reduction in 5-week mortality (7.64% versus 7.24% control); the reading of that null as filling the funnel's empty quadrant is Egger et al.'s, not the trial's.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Then the very large ISIS-4 trial (1995, ~58,000 patients) found no mortality benefit, landing near the null exactly where the missing small studies should have scattered.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c031ef0a8c95 · see in the full table