Algebra¶
Lang, S. (2002). Algebra. Springer.
Cited by¶
24 citations across 24 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Equivalence Relation
- Mathematics is the originating domain, with Lang (2002) presenting equivalence relations as the unifying formal device behind cosets, similarity classes, and quotient constructions across abstract algebra.
This sourceComprehensive graduate algebra; develops cosets, congruences, similarity classes, and quotient constructions across groups, rings, modules, and fields with equivalence relations as the unifying device.
- Mathematics is the originating domain, with Lang (2002) presenting equivalence relations as the unifying formal device behind cosets, similarity classes, and quotient constructions across abstract algebra.
- Monoid
- There is no third law: neither commutativity nor inverses is required.
This sourceDefines a monoid as a set with an associative law of composition and a two-sided unit element, requiring neither commutativity nor inverses, and gives the additive and multiplicative monoids of the natural numbers.
- There is no third law: neither commutativity nor inverses is required.
Domain-specific¶
- Algebraically closed field
- Anticommutative property
- Coefficient
- Conjugacy class
- Degree of a field extension
- Diagonal subgroup
- Division (mathematics)
- Étale Algebra
- A presentation
A=k[x]/(f)is especially transparent whenfis square-free: the derivative criterion\gcd(f,f')=1detects separabilityThis sourceFor the derivative criterion — f has no repeated root exactly when gcd(f, f') = 1, which is Lang's separability test for a polynomial; the étale-algebra reading of k[x]/(f) is the article's own framing. For the primitive-element theorem for finite separable extensions and for a separable element's minimal polynomial having no repeated root (Chapter V, algebraic extensions). For the input fact that R and C are the only finite extensions of R (Chapter XI, real fields); the R^r x C^s form for étale algebras is the article's own deduction from its earlier product theorem.
SupportedVerified against the source
- A presentation
- Field (Algebraic)
- Galois theory, which answers the question of when polynomial roots can be expressed in radicals, is entirely organised around the lattice of intermediate fields between a base field and a splitting field extension, with field automorphisms playing the role of symmetries
This sourceLang's Algebra treating Galois theory through the correspondence between intermediate fields and the Galois group, with the criterion that an extension is solvable by radicals exactly when the associated group is solvable. Lang's Algebra defining perfect fields and separating characteristic-zero from characteristic-p behaviour, where in characteristic p the Frobenius identity (a + b)^p = a^p + b^p holds and the derivative of a polynomial can vanish.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“result of the Galois theory for finite Galois extensions”
- Galois theory, which answers the question of when polynomial roots can be expressed in radicals, is entirely organised around the lattice of intermediate fields between a base field and a splitting field extension, with field automorphisms playing the role of symmetries
- Formal derivative
- Frobenius endomorphism
- Irreducible polynomial
- Maschke's theorem
- Minimal polynomial (field theory)
- Module (Algebra)
- Prime ideal
- Rational dependence
- Ring Homomorphism
- Rupture field
- Splitting field
- Symmetric polynomial
- Symmetrization
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 24 citations: 1 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c06e2144b4d5 · see in the full table