Dimensional Analysis¶
Bridgman, P. W. (1920). Dimensional Analysis. Yale University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Curse Of Dimensionality
- Not dimensional analysis. `dimensional_analysis` reasons about physical units and their consistency to derive scaling laws; the curse concerns degrees of freedom of a state space and how volume grows with their count.
This sourceFoundational treatment of dimensional analysis: reasoning about physical units and their consistency to derive scaling laws — distinct from degrees-of-freedom dimensionality.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Bridgman supports the description of dimensional analysis as unit-consistency reasoning used for scaling and model experiments; he says nothing about the curse of dimensionality.
“the dimensions of all terms will remain the same. This is known as the principle of dimensional homogeneity”
- Not dimensional analysis. `dimensional_analysis` reasons about physical units and their consistency to derive scaling laws; the curse concerns degrees of freedom of a state space and how volume grows with their count.
- Dimensional Analysis
- (1959) and Bridgman
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Bridgman's 1922 preface says he is giving the first systematic exposition of the principles of dimensional analysis, supporting his half of the 'formalized by' attribution.
“I have, therefore, attempted a systematic exposition of the princi- ples underlying the method of dimensional analysis”
- (1959) and Bridgman
Mechanisms¶
- Dimensional Analysis Table
- The table confirms the formula is dimensionally homogeneous before a single number is plugged in.
This sourcePresents symbolic dimensional-consistency checking as a method used before numerical substitution.
- The table confirms the formula is dimensionally homogeneous before a single number is plugged in.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:c07e8527ed55 · see in the full table