Thou shalt not steal: Taking aversion with legal property claims¶
Faillo, M., Rizzolli, M., & Tontrup, S. (2018). Thou shalt not steal: Taking aversion with legal property claims: Taking aversion with legal property claims. Journal of Economic Psychology.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Moral impunity test
- A modern scratchcard experiment offers an unlike empirical probe: A participants can give to, leave with or take from B participants under a double-blind procedure, while B's claim to the cards is established in advance.
This sourceProof pp. 3–6 §§2.2–4 and pp. 8–10 Appendix A support the property-claim, double-blind and four-cell procedure; proof §4 and Table 2 support the bounded outcome; §5 discusses interpretation. Publisher metadata identifies the final issue as Journal of Economic Psychology 71 (March 2019), 88–101, but the final paginated full text was not inspected. Page references here are to the in-press proof, whose placeholders must not be mistaken for the final pagination. Anonymity was not randomized between treatment cells.
- A modern scratchcard experiment offers an unlike empirical probe: A participants can give to, leave with or take from B participants under a double-blind procedure, while B's claim to the cards is established in advance.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c151c82481de · see in the full table