United States v. Moore¶
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. (2014). United States v. Moore.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Partial Verdict
- The timing defect is distinct from the nonunanimity exposed by a poll.
This sourceFull original official opinion inspected. It recognizes Rule 31(b)(2) while holding that premature judicial solicitation before indicated impasse required vacatur of the affected Count Two conviction; the unaffected Count Three remained in place.
- The timing defect is distinct from the nonunanimity exposed by a poll.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c19bf748d19c · see in the full table