Structural Holes¶
Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.
Cited by¶
13 citations across 13 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Arbitrage (Generalized)
- Burt (1992) formalizes the underlying network mechanism in Structural Holes: actors who span otherwise disconnected clusters capture brokerage value precisely because the two sides cannot directly evaluate each other—exactly the credential-recognition gap that prestige arbitrage exploits.
This sourceDevelops the structural-holes/brokerage account: actors who span gaps between otherwise-disconnected clusters are the unique conduits for novelty and accrue informational and control advantages; supports the bridge-across-a-structural-hole framing and the boundary-spanner-as-conduit dynamic in organizational learning and idea diffusion.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Burt's abstract establishes the structural hole as a gap between two parties with complementary resources or information, supporting the span-and-broker frame but not the 'cannot directly evaluate each other' mechanism.
“The basic element in this account is the structural hole: a gap between two individuals with complementary resources or information.”
- Burt (1992) formalizes the underlying network mechanism in Structural Holes: actors who span otherwise disconnected clusters capture brokerage value precisely because the two sides cannot directly evaluate each other—exactly the credential-recognition gap that prestige arbitrage exploits.
- Network Broker Role
- In network sociology, the structural-hole broker bridges two otherwise-unconnected clusters and captures value by arbitraging non-overlapping information flows.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Burt's abstract defines the structural hole as a gap between two individuals with complementary resources or information, backing the bridging half of the claim but not the value-arbitrage mechanism and not the gatekeeper clause.
“The basic element in this account is the structural hole: a gap between two individuals with complementary resources or information.”
- In network sociology, the structural-hole broker bridges two otherwise-unconnected clusters and captures value by arbitraging non-overlapping information flows.
- Opportunity Asymmetry
- Organizational management. Burt (1992) shows how structural holes in organizational networks give well-positioned actors brokerage opportunities and decision access unavailable to peripheral members.
This sourceDevelops the structural-holes/brokerage account: actors who span gaps between otherwise-disconnected clusters are the unique conduits for novelty and accrue informational and control advantages; supports the bridge-across-a-structural-hole framing and the boundary-spanner-as-conduit dynamic in organizational learning and idea diffusion.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract supplies Burt's definition of a structural hole as a gap between two parties holding complementary resources or information, but says nothing about brokerage opportunity or decision access in organizational networks.
“The basic element in this account is the structural hole: a gap between two individuals with complementary resources or information.”
- Organizational management. Burt (1992) shows how structural holes in organizational networks give well-positioned actors brokerage opportunities and decision access unavailable to peripheral members.
- Positional Advantage
- In network science it is centrality and brokerage: a node interior to a topology commands short paths, but the sharper case is a broker spanning a structural hole — a node that is the sole bridge between two otherwise-disconnected clusters holds control and information advantages that high degree alone does not confer, so its value is purely the Relation of bridging, and the small-world result is precisely that a few high-value positions govern global reachability.
This sourceEstablishes that a broker spanning a structural hole between disconnected clusters gains control and information advantages that degree centrality alone does not confer.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Burt's abstract defines the structural hole as a gap between two actors with complementary resources, but does not state brokerage control advantages or small-world reachability.
“The basic element in this account is the structural hole: a gap between two individuals with complementary resources or information.”
- In network science it is centrality and brokerage: a node interior to a topology commands short paths, but the sharper case is a broker spanning a structural hole — a node that is the sole bridge between two otherwise-disconnected clusters holds control and information advantages that high degree alone does not confer, so its value is purely the Relation of bridging, and the small-world result is precisely that a few high-value positions govern global reachability.
- Weak Ties
- A weak tie that spans the gap between two clusters — a "bridge" that crosses what Burt (1992) later named a "structural hole" — is often the only conduit by which novelty, opportunity, or contagion crosses from one part of the network to another.
This sourceDevelops the structural-holes/brokerage account: actors who span gaps between otherwise-disconnected clusters are the unique conduits for novelty and accrue informational and control advantages; supports the bridge-across-a-structural-hole framing and the boundary-spanner-as-conduit dynamic in organizational learning and idea diffusion.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Burt's own abstract defines the structural hole as a gap between individuals with complementary resources; it grounds the term but not the assertion that a weak tie is the only conduit for novelty or contagion.
“The basic element in this account is the structural hole: a gap between two individuals with complementary resources or information.”
- A weak tie that spans the gap between two clusters — a "bridge" that crosses what Burt (1992) later named a "structural hole" — is often the only conduit by which novelty, opportunity, or contagion crosses from one part of the network to another.
Mechanisms¶
- Network and Institutional Position Map
- Tracing the selection mechanism, the map shows the spokesperson was chosen because they occupied a bridging position between the clergy and the student wings — a structural hole they were well placed to span
This sourceDefines structural holes as gaps between disconnected contacts and explains the brokerage advantage of actors positioned to bridge them.
- Tracing the selection mechanism, the map shows the spokesperson was chosen because they occupied a bridging position between the clergy and the student wings — a structural hole they were well placed to span
- Network Centrality Analysis
- The idea of structural holes — that value accrues to the broker spanning a gap between otherwise-disconnected groups — is the sharpest statement of why a low-degree node can out-leverage a high-degree one.
This sourceDefines structural holes as gaps between otherwise disconnected actors and shows that brokers spanning them gain competitive advantage.
- The idea of structural holes — that value accrues to the broker spanning a gap between otherwise-disconnected groups — is the sharpest statement of why a low-degree node can out-leverage a high-degree one.
- Organizational Network Analysis
- Its strength is that it quantifies structure the eye cannot see across hundreds of people, and its most valuable finding is usually a structural hole — a gap between two clusters that ought to be talking and aren't
This sourceDefines a structural hole as the absence of a connection between actors with complementary resources or information.
- Its strength is that it quantifies structure the eye cannot see across hundreds of people, and its most valuable finding is usually a structural hole — a gap between two clusters that ought to be talking and aren't
- Partnership Broker
- Its strength is creating value across a structural hole — pairing complements who sit on opposite sides of a gap in the network and would never otherwise find each other, so the broker captures the returns of being the bridge between them.
This sourceShows that actors bridging structural holes can create and capture value by connecting otherwise disconnected network positions.
- Its strength is creating value across a structural hole — pairing complements who sit on opposite sides of a gap in the network and would never otherwise find each other, so the broker captures the returns of being the bridge between them.
- Reusable Broker or Convener Service
- A broker who controls access can drift into an unaccountable gatekeeper extracting rents — leveraging the position everyone depends on into a toll
This sourceShows that brokers spanning structural holes can gain control advantages in negotiations and higher returns from their network position.
- A broker who controls access can drift into an unaccountable gatekeeper extracting rents — leveraging the position everyone depends on into a toll
- Trusted Broker Routing
- Brokers spanning otherwise-disconnected groups are exactly the actors network research calls bridges across structural holes, and their non-redundant reach is what makes brokered routing succeed where a blanket send fails.
This sourceDefines structural holes as gaps between otherwise disconnected contacts and identifies brokerage across those gaps as an advantageous network position.
- Brokers spanning otherwise-disconnected groups are exactly the actors network research calls bridges across structural holes, and their non-redundant reach is what makes brokered routing succeed where a blanket send fails.
- Trusted Intermediary Warning
- In network terms the intermediary is a broker spanning a gap between parties who can't address each other directly
This sourceDefines brokerage as the position of a third party spanning a structural hole between otherwise disconnected contacts.
- In network terms the intermediary is a broker spanning a gap between parties who can't address each other directly
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 6 of 13 citations: 6 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
Registry ID ref:c19ff205a4ab · see in the full table