Political Order and Political Decay¶
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Balance
- Policy failure often results from misclassifying: proposing "balanced" solutions where real trade-offs exist (then being surprised when the "balanced" solution fails because the constraints were misunderstood).
This sourceAnalyzes how nominally balanced institutions decay through capture, clientelism, and 'repatrimonialization'.
- Policy failure often results from misclassifying: proposing "balanced" solutions where real trade-offs exist (then being surprised when the "balanced" solution fails because the constraints were misunderstood).
- Gall's Law
- In constitutional and institutional design, working constitutions historically grow from earlier working ones, while from-scratch impositions in fractured states frequently collapse because no working intermediate carried legitimacy through the transition.
This sourceArgues that durable political institutions develop incrementally and sequentially from earlier working arrangements, and that abrupt from-scratch institution-building in weak or fractured states frequently fails to take hold — the constitutional/institutional viable-intermediates case.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The excerpt argues institutional outcomes depend on prior institutions and that outsiders cannot simply install "Denmark" in failed states; constitutions are not discussed.
“Those that had strong institutions earlier were able to reestablish them after a period of disruption, while those that did not continued to struggle.”
- In constitutional and institutional design, working constitutions historically grow from earlier working ones, while from-scratch impositions in fractured states frequently collapse because no working intermediate carried legitimacy through the transition.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:c1e74a1d9a9a · see in the full table