Bioinformatics enrichment tools¶
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009). Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(1), 1-13.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Record Reconciliation
- In bioinformatics, gene names across multiple registries are reconciled, and the mapping tables — with their explicit one-to-many and many-to-one cases — are the load-bearing artifact.
This sourceDocuments gene-name/identifier mapping across registries with explicit one-to-many and many-to-one cases as the load-bearing artifact for cross-study analysis.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The survey says cross-organization gene-ID mapping is an essential, weakly handled first step; it never discusses one-to-many or many-to-one cases or mapping tables as such.
“Thus, the comprehensiveness of mapping ID-to-ID and ID-to-annotation content in the database is essential as the first step to maximally translate gene lists into possible annotation content”
- In bioinformatics, gene names across multiple registries are reconciled, and the mapping tables — with their explicit one-to-many and many-to-one cases — are the load-bearing artifact.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c21e1b9a8790 · see in the full table