Intellectual humility¶
Whitcomb, D., Battaly, H., Baehr, J., & Howard‐Snyder, D. (2017). Intellectual humility: Owning our limitations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94(3), 509-539.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Epistemic Humility
- Epistemic humility is the metacognitive discipline of calibrating confidence to actual evidential warrant: knowing what you don't know, recognizing the limits of your knowledge, remaining open to revision under new information, and matching the certainty of your claims to the strength of the evidence behind them, an account Whitcomb, Battaly, Baehr, and Howard-Snyder (2017) develop as "owning one's intellectual limitations."
This sourceDevelops the limitations-owning account: intellectual humility as proper attentiveness to and owning of one's intellectual limitations, a mean between arrogance and servility. SUPPORTS marker 211 ('owning one's intellectual limitations').
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Whitcomb et al. do define intellectual humility as attending to and owning one's intellectual limitations, including revising beliefs; calibration to evidence is attributed to rival accounts.
“Limitations-Owning. IH consists in proper attentiveness to, and owning of, one ’s intellectual limitations.”
- Epistemic humility is the metacognitive discipline of calibrating confidence to actual evidential warrant: knowing what you don't know, recognizing the limits of your knowledge, remaining open to revision under new information, and matching the certainty of your claims to the strength of the evidence behind them, an account Whitcomb, Battaly, Baehr, and Howard-Snyder (2017) develop as "owning one's intellectual limitations."
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c29dd409aea1 · see in the full table