Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making¶
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 51-71.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Structured Debate
- Its strength is that it counters premature convergence and groupthink by forcing the strongest anti-case into the room before a decision congeals — the same logic behind formal devil's advocacy in strategic decision-making
This sourceEvaluates formal devil's advocacy as a group approach to strategic decision making.
- Its strength is that it counters premature convergence and groupthink by forcing the strongest anti-case into the room before a decision congeals — the same logic behind formal devil's advocacy in strategic decision-making
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c2b3f840eb69 · see in the full table