Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations¶
GRADE Working Group. (2004). Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. BMJ, 328(7454).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Convergence Confidence Card
- Grade, don't grade-then-hide. A short ordinal confidence (e.g. low / moderate / high) with the reasoning inline, borrowing the logic of graded evidence appraisal used in medicine.
This sourcePresents medical evidence appraisal using ordered confidence grades and explicit, transparent judgments about the reasons for each grade.
- Grade, don't grade-then-hide. A short ordinal confidence (e.g. low / moderate / high) with the reasoning inline, borrowing the logic of graded evidence appraisal used in medicine.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c3934f0ff8ab · see in the full table