A Thematic Analysis of the Structure of Delimitations in the Dissertation.¶
Duke, T., & Beck, C. (2019). A Thematic Analysis of the Structure of Delimitations in the Dissertation. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 765-796.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Scope Creep
- In scientific projects, a paper's question expands as reviewers ask for one more analysis, and a thesis swells past completability.
This sourceAnalyzes how scope and delimitations are set and controlled in dissertation research to keep a project bounded and completable.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Gives only the dissertation frame — delimitations bound a study so it stays manageable and completable — and says nothing about reviewer-driven expansion or personal commitments.
“delimitations are what a researcher includes and excludes to make a project manageable and focused on the research question”
- In scientific projects, a paper's question expands as reviewers ask for one more analysis, and a thesis swells past completability.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c3e27f9fa502 · see in the full table