Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention¶
Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier, G., & Reicher, S. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(7), 1452-1463.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Bystander Effect
- Research shows the effect is weaker or reversed in collectivist societies and among in-group members.
This sourceFellow bystanders and victims influence helping only when categorized as in-group, showing shared identity (not mere presence) drives the effect.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The source's abstract shows in-group categorization drives helping, supporting only the in-group half; it does not address collectivist societies or a weaker/reversed effect.
“Analysis indicates that fellow bystanders are only influential when they are in‐group rather than out‐group members. Furthermore, bystanders are more likely to help victims who are described as in‐group as opposed to out‐group members.”
- Research shows the effect is weaker or reversed in collectivist societies and among in-group members.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c442fa9386a5 · see in the full table