Provenance and scientific workflows¶
Davidson, S. B., & Freire, J. (2008). Provenance and scientific workflows: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 1345-1350.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Provenance
- Provenance converts a potentially infinite verification problem—"How do I independently verify this object's authenticity from first principles?"—into a bounded forensic task: "Can I establish a plausible, documented chain from origin to present, and are the gaps explicable?"—a reframing Davidson and Freire (2008) argue underwrites scientific-workflow provenance research.
This sourceACM. Argues that scientific-workflow provenance reframes verification from first-principles reproducibility to bounded chain-of-derivation auditing.
- Provenance converts a potentially infinite verification problem—"How do I independently verify this object's authenticity from first principles?"—into a bounded forensic task: "Can I establish a plausible, documented chain from origin to present, and are the gaps explicable?"—a reframing Davidson and Freire (2008) argue underwrites scientific-workflow provenance research.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c69ab76696c5 · see in the full table