The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity¶
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2021, The Physical Science Basis.
Cited by¶
10 citations across 10 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Clearance Rate
- In atmospheric science, the methane-versus-CO2 asymmetry in atmospheric lifetime is structurally central to climate policy.
This sourceDocuments the contrasting atmospheric lifetimes of methane (~12 yr) and CO2 and their differing implications for climate policy.
- In atmospheric science, the methane-versus-CO2 asymmetry in atmospheric lifetime is structurally central to climate policy.
- Counterfactual Subtraction
- Climate attribution: observed climate compared to a counterfactual model simulation without anthropogenic forcing, with the difference attributed to human influence.
This sourceAttributes observed warming to anthropogenic forcing by differencing observed climate against counterfactual no-/natural-forcing model simulations (see Ch. 3, Human Influence on the Climate System).
- Climate attribution: observed climate compared to a counterfactual model simulation without anthropogenic forcing, with the difference attributed to human influence.
- Deep Time
- Understanding present climate change requires anchoring it within this deep-time context, as the IPCC AR6 Working Group I report (2021) does in its paleoclimate chapter and its long-term-commitment projections, which integrate ice-core, sediment, and geochemical proxy records spanning multi-millennial baselines into formal climate-system commitments.
This sourceIntegrates paleoclimate proxies across multi-millennial baselines and formalizes 'long-term commitments' (anthropogenic warming/CO2 essentially irreversible on human timescales).
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Report-level description says AR6 WGI draws on paleoclimate information; it does not mention ice-core or sediment proxies, multi-millennial baselines or long-term commitments.
“It considers in situ and remote observations; paleoclimate information; understanding of climate drivers and physical, chemical, and biological processes and feedbacks”
- Understanding present climate change requires anchoring it within this deep-time context, as the IPCC AR6 Working Group I report (2021) does in its paleoclimate chapter and its long-term-commitment projections, which integrate ice-core, sediment, and geochemical proxy records spanning multi-millennial baselines into formal climate-system commitments.
- Elasticity
- In environmental science, climate sensitivity — the temperature response to a doubling of CO₂ — is structurally an elasticity.
This sourceDefines equilibrium climate sensitivity — the temperature response to a doubling of atmospheric CO₂ — structurally a stimulus–response elasticity.
- In environmental science, climate sensitivity — the temperature response to a doubling of CO₂ — is structurally an elasticity.
- Scenario Planning
- It also identified "scenario-dependent" bets: large-scale battery storage procurement made sense in high-RPS/accelerated-cost scenarios but was uneconomical in low-RPS/baseline-cost scenarios, a staged-commitment logic consistent with the indicator-based scenario monitoring used in IPCC AR6 Working Group I (2021).
This sourceSynthesizes paleoclimate evidence (ice cores, sediment proxies, geochemistry) across multi-millennial baselines and formalizes "long-term commitments": even with immediate emissions cessation, anthropogenic CO2 remains elevated for many millennia, anchoring climate policy in deep-time consequences.
- It also identified "scenario-dependent" bets: large-scale battery storage procurement made sense in high-RPS/accelerated-cost scenarios but was uneconomical in low-RPS/baseline-cost scenarios, a staged-commitment logic consistent with the indicator-based scenario monitoring used in IPCC AR6 Working Group I (2021).
- Teleconnection
- The attribution problem here is precisely what the IPCC AR6 Working Group I (2021) treats systematically when separating teleconnected drivers from local forcing in regional climate change.
This sourceSynthesizes paleoclimate evidence (ice cores, sediment proxies, geochemistry) across multi-millennial baselines and formalizes "long-term commitments": even with immediate emissions cessation, anthropogenic CO2 remains elevated for many millennia, anchoring climate policy in deep-time consequences.
- The attribution problem here is precisely what the IPCC AR6 Working Group I (2021) treats systematically when separating teleconnected drivers from local forcing in regional climate change.
- Time
- Unowned Known Risk
- In climate policy, the high-probability harms of cumulative emissions are common knowledge, prevention costs are diffuse across nations, sectors, and generations, political horizons are short, precursor events (heatwaves, fires, floods) are absorbed as bad-luck variance, and ex-post narratives frame disasters as surprises.
This sourceEstablishes the high-probability harms of cumulative emissions as scientific common knowledge, the prototypical diffuse-ownership, horizon-mismatched risk.
- In climate policy, the high-probability harms of cumulative emissions are common knowledge, prevention costs are diffuse across nations, sectors, and generations, political horizons are short, precursor events (heatwaves, fires, floods) are absorbed as bad-luck variance, and ex-post narratives frame disasters as surprises.
Domain-specific¶
- Ad Populum (Appeal to the People)
- The scientists' concurrence is not a socially transmitted echo — each conclusion rests on independent lines of evidence (instrumental temperature records, isotopic signatures of fossil-fuel carbon, radiative-transfer physics) evaluated by separate research groups
This sourceIPCC AR6 WGI Summary for Policymakers, whose assessments combine multiple lines of evidence - observations, new analyses and model simulations - in attributing human influence.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“methods combining multiple lines of evidence lead to improved understanding of human influence on a wider range of climate variables”
- The scientists' concurrence is not a socially transmitted echo — each conclusion rests on independent lines of evidence (instrumental temperature records, isotopic signatures of fossil-fuel carbon, radiative-transfer physics) evaluated by separate research groups
- Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity
- Doubling CO2 from a different background state is a state-dependent experimental sensitivity and is not automatically this conventional ECS.
This sourceOfficial assessment; definitions of ECS and TCR, effective-ECS conversion and paleoclimate forcing/ice-sheet limits.
- Doubling CO2 from a different background state is a state-dependent experimental sensitivity and is not automatically this conventional ECS.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 10 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
Registry ID ref:c7819d357d10 · see in the full table