The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)¶
Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., Bellomo, R., et al. (2001). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Domain-specific¶
- Case-Definition Drift
- . Psychiatric and developmental epidemiology — the multi-decade autism-prevalence debate under successive DSM revisions (DSM-III → IV → 5), the field's canonical problem of apportioning an observed rise between real change and definitional broadening. Cancer staging and survival epidemiology — the Will Rogers phenomenon under successive AJCC editions, where refined staging migrates borderline patients and lifts the apparent survival of both stages with no real outcome change (a threshold-shift special case). Critical-care / sepsis surveillance — the Sepsis-½/3 transitions, which partly disagree on who counts as septic
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
“possible admission to critical care or highdependency facilities”
- . Psychiatric and developmental epidemiology — the multi-decade autism-prevalence debate under successive DSM revisions (DSM-III → IV → 5), the field's canonical problem of apportioning an observed rise between real change and definitional broadening. Cancer staging and survival epidemiology — the Will Rogers phenomenon under successive AJCC editions, where refined staging migrates borderline patients and lifts the apparent survival of both stages with no real outcome change (a threshold-shift special case). Critical-care / sepsis surveillance — the Sepsis-½/3 transitions, which partly disagree on who counts as septic
- Ground-Truth Drift
- In 2016 the "Sepsis-3" consensus redefined sepsis from the older SIRS-based criteria (two or more of abnormal temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, or white-cell count with suspected infection) to a definition centered on organ dysfunction, operationalized by an acute rise of 2 or more points in the SOFA score
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
“The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)”
- In 2016 the "Sepsis-3" consensus redefined sepsis from the older SIRS-based criteria (two or more of abnormal temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, or white-cell count with suspected infection) to a definition centered on organ dysfunction, operationalized by an acute rise of 2 or more points in the SOFA score
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c7845b513b19 · see in the full table