The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases

Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Venetis, C. A., Davies, A., Ogden, J., et al. (2014). The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study. BMJ, 349.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2014

Volume

349

DOI

10.1136/bmj.g7015

DOI registrant

BMJ

Link

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7015

Cited from

communication_media_studies

Cited by

3 citations across 3 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Summary Substance Divergence
  • The incentives diverge — the abstract author optimizes for impact, the limitations author for defensibility — and the surfaces drift apart, producing the documented abstract-overstatement gap that propagates into press releases and headlines built on the abstract alone.

    This sourceShows that exaggeration in news coverage of health science is strongly associated with exaggeration already present in press releases built on the paper's abstract — the summary-surface overstatement propagating downstream.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    Sumner et al. report that exaggerated claims in news coverage track exaggeration already present in the associated press releases, but say nothing about author incentives or an abstract-specific overstatement gap.

    “Exaggeration in news is strongly associated with exaggeration in press releases. Improving the accuracy of academic press releases could represent a key opportunity for reducing misleading health related news.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Domain-specific

• Headline-Body Mismatch
  • The defining case is science and health journalism, where the claim-strength cascade is documented

    SupportedVerified against the work's full text

    “The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

• Quote Laundering
  • Science journalism — the documented home: a paper's "associated with" finding becoming a press release's "causes," then a blog's "definitive proof," then a meme, the pattern traced through the replication-crisis and science-communication literatures

    Supported in partVerified against the source

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 3 of 3 citations: 1 supported, 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:c7daa2ab0698 · see in the full table