On the Extraordinary¶
Truzzi, M. (1978). On the Extraordinary: An Attempt at Clarification. Zetetic Scholar.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Symmetric Response to Asymmetric State
- The asymmetric-burden insight from legal procedure transferred into the scientific maxim that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, carrying the structural form — an asymmetric standard conditioned on the state — intact.
This sourceArticulates 'an extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof' as an asymmetric evidentiary standard conditioned on the prior state.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Truzzi states the maxim and ties the evidence demanded to how extraordinary a claim is, but says nothing about its origin in legal burden-of-proof procedure.
“The degree to which an event is seen as extraordinary should certainly affect how much evidence we should demand for its proof”
- The asymmetric-burden insight from legal procedure transferred into the scientific maxim that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, carrying the structural form — an asymmetric standard conditioned on the state — intact.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c7fb87d1fc09 · see in the full table