Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning¶
Hohfeld, W. N. (1917). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. The Yale Law Journal, 26(8), 710-770.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Role Rights and Duties Matrix
- A clean matrix distinguishes having a right from having a power, which stops the common confusion of "I'm allowed to" with "I get to decide."
This sourceDistinguishes a right or privilege from a power that changes legal relations, separating permission from decision authority.
- A clean matrix distinguishes having a right from having a power, which stops the common confusion of "I'm allowed to" with "I get to decide."
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:c89564cd1578 · see in the full table