Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership¶
Financial Action Task Force. (2014). Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Beneficial Ownership and Influence Disclosure
- Its strength is leverage: a single well-kept register makes concealment expensive and equips every other mechanism, from the capture audit to the scoring rubric, with facts they would otherwise have to guess at — the transparency-as-disinfectant premise that visible interests are harder to abuse.
This sourceExplains that timely, accessible beneficial-ownership information reduces opportunities for misuse and helps authorities identify, trace, prevent, and investigate abuse.
- Its strength is leverage: a single well-kept register makes concealment expensive and equips every other mechanism, from the capture audit to the scoring rubric, with facts they would otherwise have to guess at — the transparency-as-disinfectant premise that visible interests are harder to abuse.
- Revenue Source Audit
- Its honest limit is that it can only follow what is traceable: genuinely dark money, offshore vehicles, and soft support (favourable coverage, an implied future job) resist tracing, so a "clean" audit can miss real dependence — and, being a snapshot, it ages the moment it is filed.
This sourceExplains that tracing can follow only what is traceable, so a clean audit can still miss real dependence.
- Its honest limit is that it can only follow what is traceable: genuinely dark money, offshore vehicles, and soft support (favourable coverage, an implied future job) resist tracing, so a "clean" audit can miss real dependence — and, being a snapshot, it ages the moment it is filed.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:c929ef9292f7 · see in the full table